By Rose Simpson
I spent International Women’s Day as I always do.
I went to the laundromat to ensure that Scott had clean clothes for work, then I piddled around the house washing up, then prepared three meals for myself, two for Scott, one for Nick.
I took Scott to work, then came home, wrote my blog about lousy cop drivers, then watched The View.
In the afternoon, I went to the gymnasty to have my butt kicked by my personal strainer who has given me four free sessions to tempt me into signing up for more. I won’t be taking personal training, I mean who can afford to pay someone $75 a hour when she rarely makes that in a week?
But, hey, a girl can dream.
I’ve been on this planet for more than half of the 100 International Women’s Days, and I can say, unequivocally, that I am worse off economically than I was three decades ago. Last year, in spite of applying for at least 100 jobs and getting 10 job interviews, I made $12,000 which includes $6,000 I received from income splitting Scott’s pension.
The last time I made $6,000 was back in 1979 when I was writing a freelance column for the Ottawa Citizen and trying to make my way in a piece work world. During the 1980s, even counting time out to have three children, I made a steady income ranging from $75,000 to $130,000. By the 1990s, I found myself in serious economic decline when I became a single parent. In my best year of that decade (1993), I made $30,000 and in my worst year (1998) I made $15,000.
Things got even worse in the 2000 until I managed to get a poorly paying fulltime job — by professional standards — working at a national association. That job paid me $47,000 and I managed to keep it for two years before getting laid off. Helping to put three kids through university in the last part of this decade eroded whatever gains I had made, which led to the awful income tax return of $12,000 last year.
So I would say, the day after International Women’s Day, that I am not celebrating. Today, I have no job, just a few small contracts, and no retirement in my future.
I look back at my mother’s life, the life of a widow of a soldier who died in 1957. My mother’s life was sad and backbreaking as she raised three kids on her own, first on welfare, then on the salary of a factory worker. Her retirement was awful. By the time she got her pension, she could barely walk thanks to years of bending over looms in 35 degree temperatures working in a sweater factory.
I vowed not to be like my mother. I got educated and I was at the top of my game at the age of 25. Then I made the serious mistake of getting married, then divorced. Single motherhood shattered any dreams I had for a better life for me.
Now I look at my young daughter, beautiful, smart and educated. At 21, she has already landed herself a good paying job — making nearly as much as I made at my last job in my 40s. She has her own apartment, a brand new car and a go-getting attitude.
Time will tell whether she can sustain it.
I’ve already cautioned her about the allure of love, marriage and children. It’s a seductive path paved with landmines, but this path is not for the faint hearted. Marital success can reap great benefits, but marital failure can signal doom.
Motherhood — at least single motherhood, widowed or divorced — is the enemy of the emancipated woman.
Until we can figure out a way to make single motherhood work for us economically, we have nothing to celebrate.
0.000000
0.000000